28.10.What lies behind the cashew(pea)nut butter by Alfredo

While at a birthday party I got engaged in a fierce discussion about the difference of an functional benefit and a emotional benefit for a brand or product. Ok, for starters - not to come over as your average nerd with a limited interest in only marketing. I did have a good time at that party! As a matter of fact, all the usual conversation subjects of a party such as the gossips, politics, newest models of cars, the assessment of each others dates and past dating bloopers were all discussed. But when the beers really kicked in - that’s when the discussions took off. We became your average nerds…

No seriously, it all started with a plain but very clear hypothesis: products which are designed to perform a specific function are better, more innovative, products than most of the new ‘innovative’ fast-moving consumer products that, except for taste and nutritious values, are masked with a lot of persuasive advertising just to ‘lure’ consumers’ cash out of their wallets and therefore don’t really serve any need. For instance: a walkman or a mp3 player has clear function. On the opposite: the function of a cashew nut peanut butter is not really clear. As a strategic planner in an advertising agency I couldn’t let this one go by without a fight. My business is obviously to ‘lure consumers’ cash out of their wallets’ and therefore I had to make my stand. I love a good branding fight.

By the way, I truly hope readers of Klatergoud.com don’t see me as the marketing anti-Christ with all the bad intentions of deceiving consumers for their money. Because, really I’m not - but by saying this I just made my most important point in this article. Just give me some time to come back to this later on.

See, the product in dispute was a product innovation of Albert Heijn (‘AH’ is a chain of Dutch supermarkets of Ahold Inc.). This product is a line extension of the peanut butter range sold at AH and is strangely called ‘cashew nut peanut butter’. There you go - its not peanut butter, but a sandwich spread product made out of a paste of cashew nuts. Basically it’s cashew nut butter but as the association with this product are not easily made, AH decided to still call it a ‘peanut butter’.
A very important part of the product is its packaging. The cashew nut peanut butter is part of the ‘AH Excellent’ luxury brand of products. Synonymous for products of an unique quality, with a exceptional recipe and an own character made for, and I quote: ” an intense taste experience*”.

Do we need this product? Obviously not! Might we have the intention to buy this product once? Well - yes, we might! And there is were an evil persuasive advertising campaign comes in handy and plays with the minds of us the innocent consumers.

We consumers (it’s hard to believe, but we are also one of you - although a lot of colleagues in the industry might not directly agree on this) have a lot of difficulties in assessing emotional benefits and share them with professionals in the marketing field. Most often in interviews, we have the preference not to reveal certain emotional motives to marketers, based on the beliefs that 1) we make all our decisions completely objectively or perhaps because 2) emotional motivation is at a subconscious level that we simply can not identify or articulate. Other barriers to uncovering our emotional motivation to buy a product include the rational purchasing consciousness and the fear of the ‘hidden persuaders’.

The term ‘rational purchasing consciousness’ means that we consumers prefer to believe that we make decisions based upon purely objective and observable criteria about the product at hand. Emotional motivation threatens this belief system. This is why so many people say that advertising doesn’t affect them, despite of the fact that millions of euros are still being spend on advertising each year!
Moreover, many of us fear that if marketers really know how we think (remember? I am a consumer), they might take advantage of them and sell us things they don’t really need, hence the ‘hidden persuaders’.

A brand or a product like AH’s Excellent cashew nut peanut butter contains a emotional benefit which is a complex, positive and cognitive statement that we consumers are able to make about ourselves due to our use, display and attachment to the product’s brand and features. In other words: ‘something nice I can say about myself because I use the product’. Emotional benefits relate directly and powerfully to our self-concept (e.g. how we see ourselves, how other should see ourselves and how we ideally want to see ourselves). That’s why emotional benefits are so vital to branding and advertising. And why we marketers want to link a brand or a product like AH’s Excellent cashew nut peanut butter to the consumers’ self-concept. Ideally: we want that the product endures a life-time relationship with the consumer. This is only possible if we (see, now I am a marketer) understand the core values and principles which consumers, we, use to define them.

Made them totally rational, emotional benefits would sound a bit like:

  • “I am an attractive person because I wear the newest and very in fashion jeans of Diesel”
  • “People see me as a productive person because I’ve bought a computer with a fast processor”
  • “I want people to see me as ‘modern’ and ‘in touch with the newest technology’ and that’s why I bought the newest iPhone”.

But a self-concept, like an emotional benefit, is not translatable into rational predominations in which we are fully aware of. Because of the fact that we most likely will never agree to them! When we were to read one of the emotional benefit statements above and we are asked for levels of agreement, we would get a much lower level of agreement than it is in fact the case or would reflect our normal consumer behaviour. Thinking rationally about these benefits, makes us conscious of them and would somewhat nullify them as well. We would say things like: “Oh come on, I’m being ridiculous - buying this product doesn’t really make me a different person.” We were probably be right, although were are not.

The point is, most of us cannot raise emotional benefits to this level of consciousness, so the impact of evil persuasive advertising remains - whether we like it or not. It’s just too damn hard. Commercials do work and serve a need!

I - as a marketer and a consumer, am also very (sub)conscious of this. As I pointed out earlier. I am concerned how you, the readers, would see me: as a marketing anti-Christ or not. My self-concept is also in dispute whether I like it or not. Writing this very article and uploading it online for everyone to read DOES make me a different person and therefore serves a need for me. Sharing this with (hopefully) millions of readers all over the world reinforces this need. Yes, I am an attention junky!

- Let me catch some breath here -

… And now that I’ve let myself go. Let’s go back to the cashew nut peanut butter. Buying this luxury product would make me feel a ‘better person’ in the sense that I would be seen by others as someone having an exclusive taste for delicate high quality food, able to make an extra cash expenditure for this premium product and someone who’s conscious of what I eat. It would make me feel a little bit better but I will never admit to it…. Imagine! Now that’s an idea.

It has been emotional,

Alfredo Silva

* visit www.ah.nl for more cashew nut peanut butter - it’s in Dutch, and no, we are not sponsored by them!

Tags: , , , ,

Tags: , , , ,
Permalink // // // Print This Post // Email This Post //
  • Gijs Oostendorp
    In reply of this 'nut-case' I would like to state that, this product had even occurred to my girlfriend, a non-marketing spoiled, authentic consumer with all-day observations. She referred to it as the 'nut-spread' and believed it to be a perfect example of today’s unlimited wild growth of absurd ideas that jump out of the minds of the upper-class elite that hold the jobs that form the offspring of these nonsense. It might not be called 'nut-spread', but it is also not referred to as: peanut butter, with added cashew nut pieces. Most probably because it makes it sound useless, or less attractive. But what my girlfriend was meant to make clear, is that it seems as if, this ivory tower based elite often tries to make clear to us that our daily live is too boring and we should conform to their re-invented authenticity, with artificial branding and 2.0 originals. "No longer should you feed your children outdated peanut butter, welcome to the world of 'nut-spread'!" Typical enough the product in dispute is peanut butter! Which, in Holland, is endorsed with the pay-off: "Who didn't grew up with it?!" Apparently this rhetorical question did got answered by some trainee, which resulted in this ingenious climax of the additives industry! Oh yes, the unlikely does occur, it is possible! It's even possible that someone prefers this insult to one of sandwich's most widely accepted close players, instead of the intended paste as it was meant to be. But its contribution to society, is not represented by the unequal fight other products go through, in order to make it to the shelf. Entry barriers are formed by high costs for shelf space and competition is fierce. Especially young entrepreneurs with innovative products find a hard time achieving this position. The powerful lobby and investment strength of incumbent firms leaves them with little changes. Conservative incumbent firms (both retail and large FMCG multinationals) are more protective to their position then explorative and who's to blame them?! (watch it! rhetorical, do not react upon this!) Large R&D facilities often consume large budgets on research for risk limitations, before resources are allocated to the product. Good ideas of new entrants often face extremely high barriers before market introduction is even possible. It might often seem as if supermarkets and FMCGers have an enduring beef on pricing and shelf space, but in fact they are best friends. The investment in shelf space is of major importance to incumbent FMCG multinationals. Since they know, they have more to fear from the new entrant and its innovative solutions, than from the semi-inspired ideas of the risk averse marketing elite with vertical value chain aspirations in a variety of categories. These industries co-protect their positions and live in harmony. Little innovation can be expected from the ones that fear their position can be overthrown by new initiatives. As a result every introduction on the shelf has to be launched in a somewhat adult phase. Skipping the necessary adolescent growth phase, means the product is unable to co-evolve with its users which results in a variety of miss fits and flaws. Most introductions there fore either flop or receive artificial reanimation. The later is presented by the nut-case and altogether the fast moving consumer goods industry evolves in the hardly moving consumer goods industry. The observation made in the article at the party, was correct, but also a paradox characteristic for the entire FMCG industry. Most product introductions do not differentiate on their applications, rather then variations. Taste is a righteous reason for innovation, but nut-spread does not fall in between the practical benchmark of naked-cooking and Michelin star cuisine.

    Too bad they make it to the shelf so easily. More and more the brand value of Ah excellence seems to be: consistence in irrelevance. Either copy-catting the product that's already there, or devaluating a never loosing concept, such as peanut butter! It has to be said that A-brands were asleep during the late 90s, especially when it came to the fresh cooled categories, but the home-grown brand of AH went a little out of line-extensions with the introduction of a 4 quality degree spectrum within A-brand dominated categories... which they so adequately self-prove with the introduction of 'nutspread in a potty'. This is not an excellent product, it does not represent the finest quality in its category. It excels in blunt vertical in-store category 'penutration', keeping other useful applications off-shelf. Aligning resources to such little value adding projects is the most unsustainable habit of the western society and is likely to not only ruin the farmers that were suppressed for it, but also the highly sensitive children that eat this feast of additives. The later are easy to recognise by the so called 'box-bike' that usually stands in front of the AH and the fact that they wear half of the product's content in their long hair, forming the ever hip 'fast moving consumer kid' look. That's most probably where most of the products possibilities lie, alternative use: hair gel! This analysis brings us to the cleaning of another overdone shelf... Let's use this opportunity to (virtually) fill them with great stuff that people really need, since it targets their latent needs! But what are those needs, what are those products and most important how do we get it there?! I guess Klatergoud.com would be of great contribution to society if such findings would lead to great innovations! To the editors and readers congratulations on your new e-zine, I wish you all great explorative power and useful insights!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Quick links:
Recent comments