<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blame the weather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klatergoud.com/2009/12/blame-the-weather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klatergoud.com/2009/12/blame-the-weather/</link>
	<description>A place for big ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:31:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerkM</title>
		<link>http://www.klatergoud.com/2009/12/blame-the-weather/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>DerkM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klatergoud.com/?p=976#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Well, it all depends on your perspective. I guess to a polar bear freezing temperatures and excessive snowfall are great, but for a tropical beetle those conditions would be very bad. In this case though, the term bad weather should be a definition, not a qualification. It&#039;s bad in terms of train operation effectiveness, but it is not bad in terms of comparing it to, say, clear blue skies and bright sunshine. I see your point that the distinction between definition and qualification can sometimes become hazy. Most &quot;bad&quot; things have their upsides, and it&#039;s better, albeit quite often harder, to concentrate on those. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Love the viral analogy. Especially as extreme cold will hamper most viruses. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it all depends on your perspective. I guess to a polar bear freezing temperatures and excessive snowfall are great, but for a tropical beetle those conditions would be very bad. In this case though, the term bad weather should be a definition, not a qualification. It&#39;s bad in terms of train operation effectiveness, but it is not bad in terms of comparing it to, say, clear blue skies and bright sunshine. I see your point that the distinction between definition and qualification can sometimes become hazy. Most &#8220;bad&#8221; things have their upsides, and it&#39;s better, albeit quite often harder, to concentrate on those. </p>
<p>Love the viral analogy. Especially as extreme cold will hamper most viruses. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
